Martin Glenn defends possible Wembley sale and says it makes economic sense

Football Association chief executive Martin Glenn insists the potential sale of Wembley is not a “betrayal” but makes sound economic sense.

Fulham and Jacksonville Jaguars owner Shahid Khan’s offer of over £800m to buy the national stadium provoked outrage in some quarters when it was revealed last month.

The FA argued releasing money tied up in the infrastructure would allow it to invest £1bn into grassroots football over 10 years, but it is still facing opposition among the county associations.

At the FA’s Council meeting at Wembley on Tuesday, Glenn delivered a lengthy argument for maximising the financial potential of the stadium.

“Receiving an offer to sell Wembley Stadium is not a ‘betrayal’,” he said in his speech, in which he claimed selling Wembley would allow the England team to “reconnect” with fans by visiting grounds around the country.

“It is not selling the ‘soul of the game’. Nor is it a desperate action by a desperate organisation. We do not need to sell. There is no need for drama, emotive language or any ‘meltdowns’.

“What we have in front of us is simply an opportunity to unleash an unprecedented amount of investment into community football.

PFA Chief Executive Gordon Taylor explains how the sale of Wembley stadium would help grassroots football in England.

“It’s an opportunity to make the FA a more profitable organisation year-on-year and increase investment.”

Glenn has defended the selling price as being in line with the market value and also stressed the FA would still retain the restrictions they specified when it was built.

These cover issues such as denying naming rights and resale options through to 2057 while also retaining all scheduled major sporting events.

“The price offered is the result of many months of work by ourselves and the leading investment banking advisers Rothschilds,” added Glenn.

Fulham and Jacksonville Jaguars owner Shahid Khan says he wants to host as many NFL games at Wembley as possible.

“It is considerably higher than the first offer received and represents good value for a part of the organisation that makes us relatively little money and which the running and upkeep costs will only continue to increase.

“Dispassionately the deal makes economic sense. There is no alternative option to rent to the Jaguars.

“Renting Wembley Stadium would not improve our financial position; it would retain our liability for improving the stadium and would not release any value for us.”